Cloud Service Equivalents Matrix
Compare equivalent services across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, and DigitalOcean. Find the right service for every cloud platform with detailed comparisons, use cases, and educational content.
Quick Lookup
Type any cloud service name to instantly see its equivalents across all providers
Filters & Search
Deploy Your Cloud Infrastructure
Get $200 credit for 60 days. Deploy droplets, databases, and Kubernetes clusters with simple, predictable pricing.
Compare cloud services effectively with hands-on training from our partners
Showing 1 of 154 service categories
Service Equivalents Comparison
Centralized access control and identity management for cloud resources | Identity | SLA: N/A Pricing: free tier Renamed from Azure AD. Integrated with Microsoft ecosystem | SLA: 99.99% Pricing: free tier Team-based access control with Owner and Member role assignments; Spaces supports bucket-level ACLs and access keys per team member; no fine-grained per-resource IAM policies comparable to AWS IAM |
Get the Complete Matrix
Download our comprehensive cloud service equivalents guide with detailed comparisons, pricing information, and migration strategies.
Recommended Resources
AWS
Cloud training and certification
Azure
Cloud training and certification
Google Cloud
Cloud training and certification
Oracle Cloud
Cloud training and certification
AWS vs Azure vs GCP
Compare 154+ equivalent services across the big three cloud providers. Find mappings for compute, storage, databases, and AI/ML services.
Oracle Cloud vs AWS vs Azure
OCI offers competitive alternatives to AWS and Azure with strong Oracle database integration and often lower pricing for enterprise workloads.
OCI vs GCP Comparison
Compare Oracle Cloud Infrastructure to Google Cloud Platform for containers, AI/ML, and data analytics workloads with SLA comparisons.
DigitalOcean vs AWS vs Azure
DigitalOcean offers simpler pricing and a developer-first experience — with strong managed databases, object storage, and Kubernetes (DOKS) at a fraction of hyperscaler complexity.
Cloud Provider SLA Comparison 2026
The headline SLA percentages look similar across providers — the real difference is what architecture you need to achieve each tier. AWS and GCP offer no SLA at all for single-instance compute.
| Deployment Tier | AWS | Azure | GCP | OCI | DO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single instance | No SLA | 99.5% | No SLA | 99.5% | 99.99% |
| Multi-zone / Multi-AZ | 99.95% | 99.95% | 99.95% | 99.95% | 99.99% |
| Multi-region active-active | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% | No SLA |
Credit Policy When SLA Is Breached
Actual SLAs vary by service tier and configuration. See individual service entries below for specific SLA details and official documentation.
Cloud Egress & Bandwidth Cost Comparison 2026
Egress costs — what you pay to move data out to the internet — are one of the most overlooked factors in total cost of ownership. The differences between providers are dramatic, especially at scale.
| Monthly Volume | AWS | Azure | GCP | OCI | DigitalOcean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First 100 GB | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free† |
| Up to 10 TB/month | $0.09/GB | $0.087/GB | $0.08/GB | Free* | $0.01/GB† |
| 10–50 TB/month | $0.085/GB | $0.083/GB | $0.06/GB | $0.0085/GB | $0.01/GB |
| 50+ TB/month | $0.07/GB | $0.05/GB | $0.04/GB | $0.0085/GB | $0.01/GB |
* OCI includes 10 TB/month free internet egress. Intra-region transfer is free on all providers. † DigitalOcean includes 1 TB/month free egress per Droplet; flat $0.01/GB thereafter.
OCI includes 10 TB/month free egress, then just $0.0085/GB. For workloads transferring 50 TB/month, OCI egress costs over 90% less than AWS.
DigitalOcean's flat $0.01/GB egress (after 1 TB/month free per Droplet) is simple and predictable — ideal for startups and SMBs wanting no egress billing surprises.
Google reduced egress costs significantly in 2023 and offers free egress to Cloudflare and other CDN partners — strong for globally distributed content delivery.
AWS and Azure charge standard egress rates regardless of destination. High egress costs create economic lock-in — factor this into long-term architecture decisions.
Cloud Security & Compliance Comparison 2026
All major providers hold enterprise-grade certifications, but their security tooling philosophy and default posture differ significantly. The right choice depends on your existing infrastructure and compliance requirements.
| Certification | AWS | Azure | GCP | OCI | DO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PCI-DSS Level 1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA (with BAA) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| FedRAMP High | ✓ | ✓ | Partial | Partial | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Security Philosophy by Provider
Security Hub aggregates findings across 200+ services. AWS IAM is the most granular in the industry. GuardDuty provides ML-based threat detection across all accounts.
Deep Active Directory integration makes Azure the default for enterprise Windows environments. Conditional Access and Microsoft Defender provide the broadest compliance dashboard.
Google pioneered BeyondCorp zero-trust. Binary Authorization for containers, Confidential Computing, and VPC Service Controls are standout differentiators from other providers.
Cloud Guard (threat detection), Security Zones (policy enforcement), and Vault (key management) are enabled by default — features other providers charge extra for.
SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, and HIPAA certified. Managed firewalls, VPC isolation, and private networking are included. FedRAMP not supported — not a fit for government workloads.