GCP environment for a highly available web app using external HTTPS load balancing to multiple web/app VM instances, wit...
Takes 30 seconds • No credit card required
I want to build an architectural diagram of the system in Sionic Demo Env 2 in GCP
7 days ago
I appreciate the effort put into designing the Sionic Demo Env 2 architecture on GCP, but I have significant concerns regarding the choice of using GCE instances for both web and application layers. While GCE provides flexibility, it introduces operational overhead in terms of scaling, patching, and managing instances. In a production environment, this can lead to downtime during maintenance and challenges in scaling to meet sudden traffic spikes. Additionally, I noticed the absence of a load balancer for the application layer, which could create bottlenecks and single points of failure. If one of the app instances goes down, the traffic might not be adequately rerouted, leading to potential service disruptions. Another production risk is the reliance on Cloud Functions for event processing. While they scale automatically, it is essential to ensure that they handle concurrent executions effectively to avoid latency issues. Overall, while the architecture is a solid starting point, I suggest considering managed services like GKE for container orchestration or App Engine for better scalability and reliability, addressing the potential operational burdens and risks associated with GCE instances.
Sign in to share your review on this architecture
Sign in to reviewOpen an interactive version — fork it, generate AI variants, or share it with your team.
Make this template your own
Estimated monthly cost
$116.03/month
11 cloud services in this architecture
Ready to build this?
Clone this architecture into your workspace and deploy it to your cloud account.
Deploy This ArchitectureTakes 30 seconds • No credit card required